Free Russia Foundation

Washington, DC · EIN 472437810 · Promotion of International Understanding · IRS code Q20

Can receive a giftListed without being asked

Their finances

from their own IRS Form 990, fiscal year 2024
Total revenue
$6M
$6,024,852
From donations
100%
$6M of revenue
Highest reported salary
$160K
NATALIYA ARNO
Spending breakdown — and why we do not lead with it
Spent on programmes
90%
$5M of $6M spent

A high figure here is not straightforwardly good. The measure counts money spent on programmes against money spent running the organisation, so it rewards charities that under-invest in staff, systems and evaluation — and it can be moved by accounting choices rather than by doing more. The largest charity raters publicly abandoned it as a headline measure for exactly that reason. It is here because it is on the filing and people look for it, not because we think it tells you who to give to.

Employees
2
Volunteers
12
Total spending
$6M
Staff costs
$380K

No comparison shown. We list only 1 charity under this cause with a filing, which is too few to rank against meaningfully. A percentile drawn from a handful of organisations looks precise and means nothing.

Figures are as the organisation reported them to the IRS. We do not adjust, score or rate them, and we do not combine them into a single number — that would require deciding how much each one matters, which is your judgement to make, not ours.

Is this your organisation? If anything here is wrong, out of date, or you would rather not be listed at all, tell us and we will correct it or remove you. We do not require a reason.

Against every Promotion of International Understanding charity in the country

296 filed under IRS code Q20 in 2025
From donations
100%
higher than 79% of them
median 93%
Spent on programmes
90%
higher than 67% of them
median 83%
Highest salary
$160K
higher than 84% of them
median $45K

A percentile here is a position among charities the IRS classifies the same way — it is not a score, and being lower is not automatically worse. A large organisation running its own veterinary hospitals will spend a different share on programmes than one that passes grants through, and both are doing their job.